Free read Four Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism ä PDF eBook or Kindle ePUB free

review Ç PDF, eBook or Kindle ePUB free Ï Andrew David Naselli

M R Albert Mohler Jr Conservativeconfessional evangelicalism John G Stackhouse Jr Generic evangelicalism Roger E Olson Postconservative evangelicalismEach author explains his position which is critiued by the other three authors The interactive and fair minded nature of the Counterpoints format allows the reader to consider the stren. It’s always frustrating to hear on the news “Evangelicals believe” because that term is either very generic or very specific depending on who you ask I never really thought about it before but the term “evangelical” is actually a highly contested term As I read this book I thought evangelicalism might be a lot like jazz Jazz is a genre of music that has a variety of subgenres So for example when you say “I’m listening to jazz” that doesn’t really tell you anything Are you listening to latin jazz Straight ahead Fusion Bebop Free The possibilities are vast in this world In the same way I think this book is a lot like that There are many many forms of evangelicalism and each has a particular view of what makes a person evangelical What convictions does one have to hold to be an evangelical Where are the boundaries and what is central What of differing opinionsThis is the beginning uestion of this book How do we define evangelical There are four views presented on the “spectrum of evangelicalism” that general editors Andrew Nasselli and Collin Hansen assembled each with a different theologian to describe what is an evangelical Here are the four positions and their authors 1 Fundamentalism – Kevin Bauder; 2 Confessionalism – Albert Molher Jr; 3 Generic – John G Stackhouse Jr; 4 Post Conservative – Roger Olsen The editors asked each author what an evangelical is and asked them to look at some issues in modern day evangelicalism that are “hot topics” according to the opinion of their evangelical scheme Some of these issues were are catholics evangelicals or can catholics be evangelicals; are those who ascribe to open theism evangelicals; their respective position on substitutionary atonement etc The format of the book was very interesting after each chapter the other three authors were able to respond to the opinions of the former a type of rebuttal if you will This made it really interesting to see all the different opinions and even categorize myself I just want to take a brief look at each position and the pro’s and con’s of each oneFundamentalism – Pros Biblical inerrancy; concerned with correct theology – this is what makes an evangelical the “fundamentals”; opposed to open theism; opposed to fellowship with heretics and do not believe catholics are evangelicals; ascribe to the traditional notion of protestant substitutionary atonement Cons fundamentalism struggles with the name “fundamentalist” Kevin Bauder expertly explains that there are “hyper fundamentalists” who worry about what clothes you wear and how long women’s hair has to be King James only sects etc This is not fundamentalism But Dr Mohler points out that unless fundamentalists uell that group the existence of fundamentalism as a viable option as evangelical is tentativeConfessional – Pros Confessional Evangelicals are similar to Fundamentalists but they argue that to be a true Evangelical you must agree with all the confessions and creeds in Church history; proponents of sound theology and biblical inerrancy; opposed to open theism; against catholics being considered evangelicals; ascribe to traditional notion of substitutionary atonement Cons I think both Fundamentalists and Confessionals are “attacked” or criticized by opponents because they believe that their conditions for being evangelical are too narrowGeneric – Pros Generic Evangelicals hold to 4 basic notions that make up an evangelical that was first proposed by David Bebbington Biblicism Conversationism Crucicentricism and Activism Cons this definition is perhaps too broad Under the auspice of that both Catholics and Mormons could be considered evangelicals Dr Stackhouse believes that they might be evangelicals just “wrong” evangelicalsPost Conservative – Pros this is the broadest definition of evangelical that you can get Dr Olsen believes that both open theists Roman Catholics and Mormons could be evangelicals as long as they hold to Bebbington’s four essentials He says that evangelicalism is a movement not an organization like the Roman Catholic Church and therefore no one can say who is “in” and who is not based a movement does not define boundaries Cons unfortunately I sympathize with Dr Olsen but I cannot agree with him Yes evangelicalism is a broad term but if there are no boundaries then why fight for anythingAs you can see the term “evangelical” is hotly debated I think I find myself in either of the first two categories and I lean heavily to Confessionalism This is a really interesting book though and I think it clarifies a lot about what it means to be an evangelical

Read Four Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism

Four Views on the Spectrum of EvangelicalismGths and weaknesses of each view and draw informed personal conclusionsThe Counterpoints series provides a forum for comparison and critiue of different views on issues important to Christians Counterpoints books address two categories Church Life and Bible and Theology Complete your library with other books in the Counterpoints seri. The individual articles are a little disappointing but the book as a whole is a great stimulus for thinking deeply about what it means to be Evangelical It does a good job introducing you to some of the fundamental uestions even if the answers do not always represent what is typical of or even the best of the various viewpoints

Andrew David Naselli Ï 5 Free read

Free read Four Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism ä PDF, eBook or Kindle ePUB free ↠ Four Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism compares and contrasts four distinct positions on the current fundamentalist evangelical spectrum in light of the history of American fundamentalism and evangeFour Views on the Spectrum of Evangelicalism compares and contrasts four distinct positions on the current fundamentalist evangelical spectrum in light of the history of American fundamentalism and evangelicalismThe contributors each state their case for one of four views on the spectrum of evangelicalism Kevin T Bauder Fundamentalis. This was my first time reading a book from the Counterpoints series Very worthwhile and I'm now seriously considering reading at least one Counterpoints book per year from here on out Regarding this topic specifically I have heard the terms evangelical and evangelicalism for years but always considered myself fuzzy on the meanings In one sense this book justified my confusion How could I have been clear on something that exists on such a spectrum But simultaneously this book has indeed provided me some much needed clarity and understanding I better understand the position I hold fundamentalism the position most closely associated with people whose books and blogs I read and podcasts I listen to confessional evangelicalism and two positions I wasn't even aware existed While not an exhaustive look at the spectrum this book has been illuminating I have been informed without the fear of editorial bias And I have also seen proof that civil disagreement and debate is still possible who knew