The Discovery of Global Warming Book ´ New Histories of Science Download · Randarenewables

Ebook The Discovery of Global Warming

The Discovery of Global Warming Book ´ New Histories of Science Download · Randarenewables ê THIS EDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY A NEWER EDITION In 2001 a panel representing virtually all the world's governments and climate scientists announced that they had reached a consensus theTainty yet so important to human survival that provisional answers were essential Weart unsparingly depicts the conflicts and mistakes and how they sometimes led to fruitful results His book reminds us that scientists do not work in isolation but interact in crucial ways with the political system and with the general public The book not only reveals the history of global warming but also analyzes the nature of modern scientific work as it confronts the most difficult uestions about the Earth's future 2003081 A clear concise description of the title

Spencer R. Weart ê Technology Ebook

THIS EDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY A NEWER EDITION In 2001 a panel representing virtually all the world's governments and climate scientists announced that they had reached a consensus the world was warming at a rate without precedent during at least the last ten millennia and that warming was caused by the buildup of greenhouse gases from human activity The consensus itself was at least a century in the making The story of how scientists reached their conclusion by way of unexpected twists and turns and in t Published in 2003 Spencer R Weart's The Discovery of Global Warming presents a history of the science of global warming This is a concise mostly uite dry account that differs from the playfulness of Bill Bryson's Short History of Nearly Everything Weart summarizes the contributions of scientists like Keeling Hansen and Manabe but I did not finish the book with a sense of what they are like what drives them or if they're characters Instead these are people as scientists gathering data and interpreting it building models and refining them jointly publishing results and building consensus The discovery that Weart refers to in the title occurs in 2001 when overwhelming consensus within the scientific community is undeniably reached Weart's no nonsense approach mostly worked for me but I would still like to know what drives someone like Keeling to be so curious about measuring CO2 in the atmosphere I suspect many scientists have a deep intuitive curiosity about seemingly trivial stuff what does it feel like and where does it come from?Some random notes Although it seems obvious in hindsight I don't think I fully appreciated how much our understanding of climate change stems from geologists wondering what causes ice ages I also appreciated the glancing history of environmentalism Much of how the public interpreted climate findings has been shaped by what seem to be broad categories of understanding within society Though each incident is uniue acid rain the ozone layer air pollution and nuclear radiation all suggest a conceptual grouping that is difficult to resist By the late 1970s the grouping had become politicized and the issue had begun to become polarized Relatedly when I read Bill Bryson's Short History the scientists seem so brilliant but the 20th century discoveries seem to reuire so much work and collaboration Are most discoveries in a new field a sort of low hanging fruit anyone can see them? Or are such discoveries really brilliant because they are made by people who observe and analyze so uniuely they see in plain sight what everyone else misses? Should scientists be willing communicators? In the 1970s Reid Bryson was sure aerosols would lead to cooling and he published and toured on this claim Given that a lot of the particulates are washed out of the atmosphere by rain his conclusion is problematic But it also was part of the process of figuring out that sulphur dioxide reflects light Now it's not uncommon to hear older folks say climate scientists predicted cooling in their childhood and uite suddenly they have changed their mind If I were alive in that time I'd want to read Reid Bryson's book that aerosols will lead to global cooling but maybe in the long run that shows that popular science writing can be counter productive The decision to mostly avoid biography allows Weart to mention Frederick Seitz while omitting his long defense of the tobacco industry against the link between smoking and cancer I wonder if he was trying to avoid turning away climate denier readers one had underlined many passages in the book I borrowed from the library and yet this struck me as a glaring omission See Merchants of Doubt for The so what can we do section at the end of this book focuses mostly on policy and broad systems Individual action is mentioned briefly as a side note

Ebook ✓ New Histories of Science ê Spencer R. Weart

The Discovery of Global Warming New Histories of Science Technology and MedicineHe face of formidable intellectual financial and political obstacles is told for the first time in The Discovery of Global Warming Spencer R Weart lucidly explains the emerging science introduces us to the major players and shows us how the Earth's irreducibly complicated climate system was mirrored by the global scientific community that studied it Unlike familiar tales of Science Triumphant this book portrays scientists working on bits and pieces of a topic so complex that they could never achieve full cer This book is uniue in the ouvre of global warming literature in that it is about the history of the development of knowledge about climate change starting 100 or years ago Great for the needed context